On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:46:40AM -0700, Barak Pearlmutter wrote: > Given the intransigence at the other end, and the clarity of the > situation, shouldn't this issue be bumped over to SPI? It seems like > it is part of SPI's mandate to arrange for lawyers to send threatening > letters and to follow up on them as appropriate. Thanks for following up on this. I forwarded this to spi-trademark when it came up and all comments were in favor of following this up. I've forwarded this mini-thread over to spi-trademark now so we can discuss it. I think this may be complicated by the fact that it's the logo and not the name that's been used. Using the Debian name is a much more clear case it seems. In any case, I'll keep this list updated on any movement in this regards. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako@debian.org http://mako.yukidoke.org/
Attachment:
pgpOXTAyEsPJO.pgp
Description: PGP signature