debian-legal Jan 2004 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: Re: popular swirl...
Scott James Remnant
Re: popular swirl...
Ben Reser
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: popular swirl...
Henning Makholm
Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
Henning Makholm
Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
Branden Robinson
Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
Henning Makholm
Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
Branden Robinson
Re: pvpgn ITP
Anthony DeRobertis
DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Don Armstrong
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Walter Landry
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
J.B. Nicholson-Owens
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
MJ Ray
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Brian T. Sniffen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Nathanael Nerode
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Nathanael Nerode
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: DFSG Freeness of Patent Reciprocity Clauses
Nathanael Nerode
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Michael Adams
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Ben Reser
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Michael Adams
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Matt Palmer
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Walter Landry
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Andrew Suffield
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Michael Adams
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Walter Landry
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Ben Reser
Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]]
Branden Robinson
latex2html license: A Letter to Leeds University
Roland Stigge
Re: latex2html license: A Letter to Leeds University
Matt Black
Re: SRFI copyright license
Lionel Elie Mamane
UnicodeData.txt : what solution ?
Sylvain LE GALL
Re: UnicodeData.txt : what solution ?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: UnicodeData.txt : what solution ?
Sylvain LE GALL
ITP: powervr -- PowerVR XFree86 drivers and kernel modules
Piotr Roszatycki
Re: ITP: powervr -- PowerVR XFree86 drivers and kernel modules
Henning Makholm
Re: ITP: powervr -- PowerVR XFree86 drivers and kernel modules
Piotr Roszatycki
Re: ITP: powervr -- PowerVR XFree86 drivers and kernel modules
Andreas Metzler
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: ITP: powervr -- PowerVR XFree86 drivers and kernel modules
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Bug#226232: ITP: glucas -- Mersenne prime testing program
Jens Peter Secher
Re: Bug#226232: ITP: glucas -- Mersenne prime testing program
Aaron Lehmann
Re: Bug#226232: ITP: glucas -- Mersenne prime testing program
Aaron Lehmann
Licence question (suprise!)
Matthew Vernon
Re: Licence question (suprise!)
Jeremy Hankins
Re: Licence question (suprise!)
Anthony DeRobertis
classes built by JDK
Nicolas Sabouret
Re: classes built by JDK
Lionel Elie Mamane
Re: classes built by JDK
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: classes built by JDK
Dalibor Topic
Re: [ardour-dev] The Ardour Manual
Robert Joerdens
Re: [ardour-dev] The Ardour Manual
Henning Makholm
Re: [ardour-dev] The Ardour Manual
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: [ardour-dev] The Ardour Manual
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: [ardour-dev] The Ardour Manual
Don Armstrong
urgente
gabriel.angelk@katamail.com
<Possible follow-ups>
urgente
gabriel.angelk@katamail.com
Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Joel Konkle-Parker
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Joel Konkle-Parker
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
MJ Ray
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Walter Landry
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Steve Langasek
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Adam McKenna
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Adam McKenna
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Adam McKenna
Quake WADs (was: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?)
Branden Robinson
Re: Quake WADs (was: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?)
Joey Hess
Re: Quake WADs
Andreas Metzler
Re: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?
Anthony DeRobertis
Request for someone to talk to copyright holders
Anthony Towns
Re: Request for someone to talk to copyright holders
Branden Robinson
Re: Request for someone to talk to copyright holders
Steve Langasek
Re: Bug#211765: Request for someone to talk to copyright holders
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Request for someone to talk to copyright holders
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Request for someone to talk to copyright holders
Anthony Towns
LinuxWorld NY banner
Jimmy Kaplowitz
Re: LinuxWorld NY banner
Steve Langasek
Re: LinuxWorld NY banner
Jimmy Kaplowitz
Re: [Spi-trademark] Re: LinuxWorld NY banner
Bruce Perens
Re: LinuxWorld NY banner
Jaldhar H. Vyas
Re: LinuxWorld NY banner
MJ Ray
latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
Roland Stigge
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
Roland Stigge
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
MJ Ray
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
Roland Stigge
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
MJ Ray
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
Jakob Bohm
Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2
MJ Ray
I: news n1
assoagenti
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Steve Langasek
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Santiago Vila
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Branden Robinson
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Alexander Cherepanov
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Glenn Maynard
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Branden Robinson
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Raul Miller
Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Anthony DeRobertis
Distribution agreement for ATI FireGL drivers
Steinar H. Gunderson
Re: Distribution agreement for ATI FireGL drivers
MJ Ray
Re: Distribution agreement for ATI FireGL drivers
Steinar H. Gunderson
Re: Distribution agreement for ATI FireGL drivers
Andrew Suffield
Re: Distribution agreement for ATI FireGL drivers
Brian M. Carlson
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Walter Landry
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Jeremy Hankins
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Don Armstrong
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Måns Rullgård
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Don Armstrong
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Måns Rullgård
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Måns Rullgård
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Jeremy Hankins
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Walter Landry
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Don Armstrong
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Jakob Bohm
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#218073: ITP: dvdrtools -- DVD writing program
Andreas Metzler
[Fwd: Re: Since you designed the Debian 'swirl' logo...]
Nathanael Nerode
Re: [Fwd: Re: Since you designed the Debian 'swirl' logo...]
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: [Fwd: Re: Since you designed the Debian 'swirl' logo...]
Benj. Mako Hill
Re: [Fwd: Re: Since you designed the Debian 'swirl' logo...]
Henning Makholm
Legal question about a model
Roland Marcus Rutschmann
Re: Legal question about a model
MJ Ray
Re: Legal question about a model
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Legal question about a [EEG head] model
Barak Pearlmutter
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Re: Legal question about a model
Roland Marcus Rutschmann
ckermit: license advice
Ian Beckwith
Re: ckermit: license advice
Henning Makholm
Re: ckermit: license advice
Ian Beckwith
Re: ckermit: license advice
Jeremy Hankins
Re: ckermit: license advice
Ian Beckwith
Re: ckermit: license advice
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: ckermit: license advice
Ian Beckwith
Re: ckermit: license advice
Henning Makholm
Re: ckermit: license advice
Ian Beckwith
moving fceu to main
Joe Nahmias
[OT] Re: moving fceu to main
Branden Robinson
Re: moving fceu to main
Anthony DeRobertis
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: moving fceu to main
Joe Nahmias
Re: Quake WADs (was: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?)
Andrew Saunders
Re: Quake WADs (was: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?)
Branden Robinson
Musical files and chords
Raphael Goulais
Re: Musical files and chords
Henning Makholm
Re: Musical files and chords
Raphael Goulais
Re: Musical files and chords
Henning Makholm
Re: Musical files and chords
Raphael Goulais
Re: Musical files and chords
Henning Makholm
Re: Musical files and chords
Raphael Goulais
Re: Musical files and chords
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Musical files and chords
Jakob Bohm
Re: Musical files and chords
Raphael Goulais
Vexira ALERT [mail from: "Internet Security Center" < >]
vexira
Vexira ALERT [mail from: "Admin" <mailservice@yahoo.com>]
vexira
Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)
Arnaud Vandyck
Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)
Arnaud Vandyck
Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)
Anthony DeRobertis
未承諾広告※5000円で開業しませんか!!
開業パック
[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Musical files and chords]]
Raphael Goulais
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Musical files and chords]]
Jakob Bohm
unsubscribe
Christopher Griffin
"Non-Free GFDL" and correct packaging practices
Scott James Remnant
Re: "Non-Free GFDL" and correct packaging practices
Steve Langasek
Re: "Non-Free GFDL" and correct packaging practices
James Troup
Re: "Non-Free GFDL" and correct packaging practices
Branden Robinson
Re: "Non-Free GFDL" and correct packaging practices
Andrew Suffield
Freetype patent issues
Alex de Landgraaf
Re: Freetype patent issues
Brian M. Carlson
Re: Freetype patent issues
Måns Rullgård
Re: Freetype patent issues
Zenaan Harkness
Re: Bug#216667: Freetype patent issues
Anthony Fok
Re: Bug#216667: Freetype patent issues
Scott James Remnant
Re: Bug#216667: Freetype patent issues
Josselin Mouette
Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?
Joe Moore
Re: Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?
Don Armstrong
Re: Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Non-free package licenses and replacements
Niklas Vainio
Re: [nvidia-*] Non-free package licenses and replacements
Jakob Bohm
Re: [upx-nrv] Non-free package licenses and replacements
Jakob Bohm
Message not available
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Mathieu Roy
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Mathieu Roy
Message not available
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Marco d'Itri
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Sven Luther
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Kenneth Pronovici
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Andreas Tille
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Sven Luther
Message not available
Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Sven Luther
debian-legal review of licenses
Daniel Quinlan
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Matthew Palmer
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Daniel Quinlan
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Henning Makholm
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Daniel Quinlan
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
MJ Ray
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Don Armstrong
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Anthony DeRobertis
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: debian-legal review of licenses
Nathanael Nerode
Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files
Ken Lunde
Message not available
Forward: Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files
Kenshi Muto
Re: Forward: Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files
Jacobo Tarrio
Re: Forward: Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Forward: Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files
Andrew Suffield
Re: Forward: Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files
Branden Robinson
License bugs for sarge
Nathanael Nerode
Re: License bugs for sarge
Raphael Goulais
Re: License bugs for sarge
Henning Makholm
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: License bugs for sarge
Nathanael Nerode
news.3
assoagenti
LaTeX2HTML license: An answer from Leeds University
Roland Stigge
Re: LaTeX2HTML license: An answer from Leeds University
Roland Stigge
Public review period for Creative Commons 2.0 license draft
Evan Prodromou
Re: Public review period for Creative Commons 2.0 license draft
Martin Michlmayr
<Possible follow-ups>
Public review period for Creative Commons 2.0 license draft
Evan Prodromou
Re: Public review period for Creative Commons 2.0 license draft
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Public review period for Creative Commons 2.0 license draft
Andrew Suffield
Re: Public review period for Creative Commons 2.0 license draft
Nathanael Nerode
Virus found in mail from you!
AvMailGate
mysql license update
Andres Salomon
Re: mysql license update
Henning Makholm
License Conflict in slmodem-2.9.5
Ben Reser
Re: License Conflict in slmodem-2.9.5
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: License Conflict in slmodem-2.9.5
Ben Reser
Re: License Conflict in slmodem-2.9.5
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: [Linux-support] License Conflict in slmodem-2.9.5
SashaK
JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Michael Adams
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Andrew Suffield
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Brian M. Carlson
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Henning Makholm
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Andrew Suffield
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Ben Reser
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Michael Adams
Revised JasPer License
Michael Adams
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
MJ Ray
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Michael Adams
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: JasPer License Issues: Some Potentially Good News
Nathanael Nerode
Help with SPIN License
mcguire
Re: Help with SPIN License
Andrew Suffield
Re: Help with SPIN License
Henning Makholm
Re: Help with SPIN License
MJ Ray
Re: Help with SPIN License
mcguire
Re: Help with SPIN License
Don Armstrong
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Help with SPIN License
Nathanael Nerode
Licences with mutually exclusive terms
MJ Ray
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms
Henning Makholm
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms
MJ Ray
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms
Måns Rullgård
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms
Andrew Suffield
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms
Måns Rullgård
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms
Andrew Suffield
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms
Brian Thomas Sniffen
XFree86 license difficulties
paul cannon
Re: XFree86 license difficulties
Glenn Maynard
Re: XFree86 license difficulties
MJ Ray
Re: XFree86 license difficulties
Mahesh T. Pai
Re: XFree86 license difficulties
MJ Ray
Re: XFree86 license difficulties
Andrew Suffield
crypto in non-free
Ian Beckwith
GPL compatibility question.
Laurent Fousse
Re: GPL compatibility question.
Andrew Suffield
Re: GPL compatibility question.
Andrew Suffield
Re: GPL compatibility question.
Laurent Fousse
Re: GPL compatibility question.
Billy Biggs
The last update was on 20:00 GMT Fri Mar 07. There are 304 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc