Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 23:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030511.231345.41653981.wlandry@ucsd.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030512042207.GL22394@imsc.res.in>
References: <[🔎] 20030512042207.GL22394@imsc.res.in>

Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in> wrote:
> So it does look like GNU is going to stick with the Invariant sections
> for a while. I would like to humbly (as a non-developer and occasional
> reader of debian-legal) make the following suggestions:
> 
> 1. Debian should indicate in its documentation that (under the DFSG)
>    the GFDL is free only if there are no invariant sections.

This part, I would say, is not completely clear.  There are other
clauses with possible problems, although minor in comparison to
invariant sections.

Regards,
Walter Landry
wlandry@ucsd.edu

Reply to:

References:
- The debate on Invariant sections (long)
  - From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>

Prev by Date: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Next by Date: Re: [OT] Droit d'auteur vs. free software?
Previous by thread: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Next by thread: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread