Re: Incremental revisions (Was: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL

To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@debian.org>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Incremental revisions (Was: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: 28 Apr 2003 10:52:24 -0400
Message-id: <1051541545.31808.105.camel@whosthere>
In-reply-to: <20030428104500.GC24405@nic.fr>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10304261227440.4455-100000@magnetron.ieee.uow.edu.au> <1051336233.3646.115.camel@bohr> <20030428104500.GC24405@nic.fr>

On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 06:45, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> Therefore, the IETF is insane often :-)

No argument there.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mjp16@ieee.uow.edu.au>
- Re: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Incremental revisions (Was: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@debian.org>