Re: I'll contact upstream
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2003, at 13:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >Huh? Why do you think that running a document written in Texinfo
> >through a Texinfo interpreter makes the document a derivative work of a
> >(specific) Texinfo interpreter?
>
> Because that's not what we're doing. We're running texinfo.tex and
> foo.texi through the interpreter.
I still can't see why this should pose a problem.
Do you think that makeinfo shares the same problem? Why?
> I'm pretty sure various portions of texinfo.tex get copied to the
> output.
Which ones? Are they even subject to copyright?
Sorry, you need much more convincing arguments IMHO.
Reply to: