Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> writes:
> On Dec 9, 2003, at 09:49, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
>> Whenever you are faced with a plausible argument for both sides, the
>> one with the more expensive lawyer wins.
>
> There is a more than plausible argument that just about everything in
> Debian violates a software patent.
Hmm, which one? Is there some patent that covers software in general
now? Not that I'd be surprised.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se
Reply to:
- References:
- Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Arnoud Engelfriet <galactus@stack.nl>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>