Re: GFDL and Anonymity --- another problem?
On 2003-10-09, Anthony DeRobertis <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Several parts of the GFDL (e.g., 4b, 4i) seem to prohibit anonymous
> modifications to a document. Quoting 4b:
> List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or entities
> responsible for authorship of the modifications in the Modified
> Version, ....
> If this requires an actual name, it seems this might fail the
> Chinese Dissident Test.
Surely an "entity" is lose enough to include, say, a Chinese Dissident
Collective created on the spot.