Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal

[Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>]

On Monday 22 September 2003 16:39, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Now, I think that the question is not really what the DFSG
> allows. Because it's pretty clear that the DSFG does not allow GFDLed
> documentation with Invariant section.
>
> The question is: do we think that tolerating this non-DFSG essays in
> some GFDLed documentation is more harmful to Debian than removing
> these GNU manuals?
>
> That's the question.

No, that's NOT the question.
As you just told, DFSG does not allow GFDLed documentation with Invariant 
Section, thus they can not be distributed in main.
Whether it is harmful or not is NOT the point. The point is that they are 
non-free, thus they can not be distributed in main.

Mike