Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Matthieu Roy wrote:
>Does everybody on that list, that thinks that GNU
>political/historical/philosophical/ texts must be DSFG compliant to be
>distributed by Debian, also thinks that the Debian logos must be DFSG
>compliant?
There's a difference at the moment between "distributed by Debian" and "part
of Debian", for various reasons. GNU political/historical/philosophical
texts must be DFSG compliant to be *in* Debian (main), but can be distributed
by Debian as part of the non-free archive (unless and until non-free is
abolished). Similarly the official Debian logo cannot be in main (and
isn't), but can be distributed by the Debian organization.
--Nathanael
Reply to: