Re: A possible GFDL compromise
You have mistaken the objection. There is no reason to think it would
be a small fractional increase, especially since little parts of
manuals--single paragraphs even--are useful reusable bits just in the
way that single functions of Lisp are.
Reusing a single paragraph is fair use--you don't need to follow the
license conditions.
> Debian doesn't have a view on this; various Debian developers have
> variou views. I have been trying to convince Debian developers that
> the GFDL's methods are proper, but you're all entitled to form your
> own opinions and make your own decisions.
Um, Debian *does* have a view on this.
My understanding is that there is no final decision. If and when the
issue is decided, I will cease discussing it here.
Reply to: