Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
* Mathieu Roy (yeupou@gnu.org) [030912 10:20]:
> Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> a tapoté :
>
> > * Richard Stallman (rms@gnu.org) [030912 02:20]:
> > > I considered this possibility in the 1980s, not as an option but
> > > rather as a potential problem. So I developed a method to make sure
> > > this would not happen: invariant sections. The danger has not gone
> > > away, so we still need invariant sections.
> >
> > That's really "end of discussion". If this clear wordings stands also
> > for the FSF, than there is nothing how the manuals can become free.
> [become free _SOFTWARE_]
become free in the sense of Debian. And that means: free according to
the DFSG. (I'm always speaking about Debian on *@lists.debian.org,
except noted otherwise. About what freedom should I speak here else?)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: