Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
* Richard Stallman (rms@gnu.org) [030912 02:20]:
> I considered this possibility in the 1980s, not as an option but
> rather as a potential problem. So I developed a method to make sure
> this would not happen: invariant sections. The danger has not gone
> away, so we still need invariant sections.
That's really "end of discussion". If this clear wordings stands also
for the FSF, than there is nothing how the manuals can become free.
So, just EOD. Sorry.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: