[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument



Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> On Mon,  8 Sep 2003 23:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Bruce Perens
> <bruce@perens.com> said:

>> I am hoping that I can deal with both organizations _as_
>> organizations.
>
> I think this very premise is shaky. No one person can really
> represent the Debian project when iot comes to the DFSG and the
> social contract -- not even the DPL has power delegatged to him to
> change fundamental issues about the project.  The only decision can
> be made is through a general resolution of the voting membership.

Would it be useful for debian-legal to designate a point-man, as it
were, who could summarize discussions here and send the result to the
FSF?  It would introduce quite a delay in any back-and-forth, but that
seems unavoidable, and it would certainly cut down on the amount of
text the FSF side would have to read while maintaining transparency.

-- 
Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333  9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03



Reply to: