On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:44:00PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > On Sunday, Sep 7, 2003, at 17:24 US/Eastern, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > >> > >>Could you point me to the section of DFSG where you see that > >>prohibiting DRM (in order to limit access and copy of the document) is > >>unambiguous non-free ? > > > >That would be #1. > > "The LICENSE of a Debian component may not..." > > How is that unambiguously non-free under DFSG 1? DFSG clearly speaks > only of the license. The subject under discussion is a license which prohibits distribution on DRM media. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
pgpQi3Vmtdjjq.pgp
Description: PGP signature