On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > You ground your argument on "second hand reports of clarifications" in > the first quoted paragraph, but then expect debian-legal to furnish > first-hand clarifications? Yes. If you're too lazy to be bothered doing that, don't expect anyone else -- either the release manager nor the glibc maintainers -- to care about your ravings. > The burden of proof is on those > who claim it's been "clarified" to come up with evidence of such. No, the burden of proof is on those who advocate a change, and it's not been met. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Is this some kind of psych test? Am I getting paid for this?''
Description: PGP signature