Re: relicensing dual-licensed works to single license.
Quoting Mark Rafn (email@example.com):
> Here's a thought: Dual-licensed works can generally be forked to be under
> either license. Doesn't this mean that the maintainer (or any distributor)
> of a "GPLv2 or any later version" work could unilaterally re-release it
> under pure GPLv2 without consulting any contributors?
I think so: He could then use that as the basis (if I understand
correctly) for a pure GPLv2 fork. Other people, encountering that but
preferring a code instance under "GPLv2 or any later version" would need
to seek out an upstream version and eschew his additions.
<BLINK>Resize your browser so the following line touches both margins!</BLINK>
Best Regards, Rick Moen, firstname.lastname@example.org