Re: debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem)
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:25:32 -0000
Message-id: <slrnbk3r8c.2ro.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <slrnbk0d5v.63m.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <1AE9D0E4-D1B4-11D7-8C9B-00039317863E@suespammers.org>

Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> wrote:
> Debian-legal really could use a FAQ.  [...]

Shouldn't your list be merged into
http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html ?

-- 
MJR/slef   My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
      http://mjr.towers.org.uk/   jabber://slef@jabber.at
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
- debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem)
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Next by Date: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy
Previous by thread: debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem)
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread