Re: LPPL and non-discrimination
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 03:39:19PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
>> Must modifications be under the ABC-DFL? If so, it's non-free because
>> to modify it you must agree that ABC can use your code in their
>> proprietary stuff.
> Uh, no, that's not the case.
Why not? A license like the GPL, but with a clause requiring that Foo
Inc. have the right to relicense any derivative works as they please
is DFSG free? One or the other of us is not understanding something
(quite possibly me, of course).
Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03