Re: LPPL, take 2
Frank Mittelbach <email@example.com> wrote:
> Note that above we also addressed the concern by (I think Walter)
> concerning 5a2 so that it now only requires run-time identification
> if the original used runtime identification
Thank you. It is extremely close. It doesn't quite allow me to take
out parts of the program and use it in "grep" if the original program
identified itself originally. A possible rewording:
2. If the Derived Work identifies itself to the user when run then
it must clearly identify itself as a modified version of the
original Work to the user when run.
This is similar to GPL 2c, which only requires notification if the
_modified_ program is interactive.