On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 09:26:52PM -0400, Jay Bonci wrote: > When looking at the RFP for cathedral-book at #111609, the license is > mentioned as the Open Publication License 2.0. The only specific > mention I see of that is at: > > http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml > and > http://opencontent.org/openpub > > http://opensource.org/licenses/ doesn't mention anything about this > either > > These are listed as 1.0 versions. Is there a version 2 that I am not > aware of, or are these (somewhat old) DRAFTs considered to be a version > two of that license? Or is this just something that I'd have to break > down and ask ESR for a copy of. > > Please reply-to-all, as I am not on the debian-legal list. > > Thank you, Heh, I just contacted the original ITP'er (Stephen Stafford) last week about taking over the ITP, and he said he'd never been able to clarify the license either. I emailed Eric Raymond about this directly, but I'm yet to receive a response. Sorry for not keeping the BTS informed, I'll forward Eric's reponse if/when I get one. -- Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org> http://www.ertius.org/ GPG keys: 1024D/1E73B7CD, 4096R/3ABDE5EC | Do I look like I want a CC? Words of the day: AUTODIN sniper attack clones BLU-97 A/B analyzer CIDA spies
Attachment:
pgpa81oRPT0eD.pgp
Description: PGP signature