On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 12:01, John Goerzen wrote: > My understanding, at least with Mozilla, was that it was dual-licensed as > MPL/GPL because of some problems with the MPL. Actually, it's tri-licensed as MPL/LGPL/GPL, or at least that's the goal. http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ and http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/license-policy.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part