Re: Dissident versus ASP

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dissident versus ASP
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <ajk@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:37:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030322143748.GG739@kukkaruukku.keltti.jyu.fi>
Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87r894unfw.fsf@becket.becket.net>
References: <[🔎] 20030318073125.GB2737@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 87r894unfw.fsf@becket.becket.net>

On 20030318T175843-0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I did.  I formulated the dissident test long before I even *knew* of
> "the ASP loophole".  I therefore did not formulate it as some strategy
> for keeping people from closing it.

Huh?

As you know, logical connectives do not talk about intentions or reasons
of formulation.

-- 
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

  Taiteellisen ohjelmoinnin ystävien seura Toys - Ohjelmointi on myös taidetta
                         http://www.cc.jyu.fi/yhd/toys/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Dissident versus ASP
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Dissident versus ASP
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: proftpd-mysql: links against OpenSSL and GPL licensed libmysqlclient10
Next by Date: MPL 1.0?
Previous by thread: Re: Dissident versus ASP
Next by thread: Re: Dissident versus ASP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread