Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test
From: Andrea Glorioso <andrea.glorioso@centrotemporeale.it>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:47:37 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u1e83aly.fsf@binary-only.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87u1e93bo0.fsf@becket.becket.net> (Thomas Bushnell, BSG's message of "11 Mar 2003 12:12:31 -0800")
References: <[🔎] 87wuj8auag.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 87n0k2do08.fsf@binary-only.com> <[🔎] 87u1e93bo0.fsf@becket.becket.net>

>>>>> "tb" == Thomas Bushnell <tb@becket.net> writes:

    tb> Yes, absolutely!  That's what started this whole discussion,
    tb> IIRC.

Good.  I was just trying to summarize one of the points that I care
most about (the RPSL and Helix being libre software).

bye,

andrea
--
Andrea Glorioso               andrea.glorioso@centrotemporeale.it
Centro Tempo Reale                http://www.centrotemporeale.it/
AGNULA/DeMuDi Technical Manager   http://www.[demudi|agnula].org/
"There's no free expression without control on the tools you use"

Reply to:

References:
- Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test
  - From: Andrea Glorioso <andrea.glorioso@binary-only.com>
- Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: Re: The Show So Far
Next by Date: Re: The Show So Far
Previous by thread: Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test
Next by thread: Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread