Re: OSD && DFSG - a conclusion
>>>>> "Philip" == Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> writes:
Philip> Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> writes:
>> I don't want this discussion to drag on forever, going round
>> and round, covering the same ground, beating a dead horse, and
>> overusing cliches and stock phrases. It sure looks like
>> there's sufficient interest in the idea of evolving the OSD &&
>> DFSG in a common direction, and maybe even making them the same
>> document.
Philip> Really?
Philip> I just read the whole thread, and the only person that
Philip> seemed to be advancing that idea was you.
I didn't advance that idea on list but actually think that it could be
a good idea to clarify bugs in the DFSG. I think it would be a lot of
effort and don't want to lead that effort, but if someone does want to
lead that effort and spend the necessary time I would not want to
stand in their way.
I do think it is important that whoever leads that effort be a member
of the Debian community not an outsider.
Reply to: