Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > I am merely quoting the closest thing to a copyright notice for all of the
> > wordlist as generally required by copyright law. RMS basically said the
> > word list meets FSF definition of Free (which should in term meet Debian
> > guidelines).
> Meeting the FSF's definition of "free" does not always imply meeting
> Debian's definition of "free", although they usually coincide.
> > That should be all that you need to know.
> Even if it was true, it still wouldn't necessarily be sufficient to
> *convince* him (and d-legal) that it's correct.
RMS gave me the all clear to use it in what is now an official GNU program
so that as all that I need. If you need more I suggest you talk to RMS
about it. I can remove that word list from my source list but I rather
not. RMS is pretty anneal about these things, please don't tell me that
d-legal is more anneal than RMS because I didn't think that would be