Re: OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: 14 Oct 2002 08:31:41 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 1034598702.22465.1.camel@bohr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021012164705.GN10464@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20021010145950.30966.qmail@oak.oeko.net> <[🔎] 20021010191650.GA1988@cs140102.pp.htv.fi> <[🔎] 20021011160346.GF1373@stonewall> <[🔎] 20021012164705.GN10464@deadbeast.net>

On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:47, Branden Robinson wrote:

> See, this is why I'm an atheist.

But I have proof! I have pictures!
http://armiesofdarkness.com/images/angel-small.jpg

;-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

References:
- OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)
  - From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
- Re: OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)
  - From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>
- Re: OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)
  - From: "Brian M. Carlson" <bmc@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
- Re: OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: cadaver licensing issues: openssl and GPL again
Next by Date: Re: Regarding linux-kernel-conf and Qt
Previous by thread: Re: OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)
Next by thread: cadaver licensing issues: openssl and GPL again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread