Re: Concluding the LPPL debate, try 2
On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 11:58, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 16:36, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > "If you want to modify a package [say, one that is not part of the
> > core LaTeX distribution, but one whose author has independently
> > put it under the LPPL], you must either
> > 1) [do the renaming stuff], or
> > 2) make sure that your modified package refuses to run on top of
> > the standard LaTeX kernel."
> > If this is correct, I don't think that option (2) is not a free
> > option.
> The main thing to consider...
Sorry for the extra followup, but it just struck me that I might have
misparsed this. Are you saying that you think option 2 is DFSG-free?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org