Re: Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion
At 04.17 +0200 2002-07-23, Jeff Licquia wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 18:24, Lars Hellström wrote:
>> At 01.31 +0200 2002-07-22, Jeff Licquia wrote:
>> >Right. The question is "what modification rights do you have?" There's
>> >good reason to believe that the "must change the file name" clause must
>> >apply to derived works as well, so each time a file changes, its name
>> >must change.
>> The claim in that last sentence is certainly unproven, and the license text
>> makes yours a highly unlikely interpretation.
>So you say. But why should I believe you? It certainly doesn't seem
>unlikely to me.
>(Remember, again, that I don't care about the intent of the license. I
>only care what it says.)
>Again: IF THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS, THEN WHY DOESN'T IT SAY THAT???!!!???
OK, at least now you're being clear that you in this thread apparently
insisted on discussing a precise text, not as elsewhere at the same time
rather the intent. This has made the last few turns rather pointless.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com