On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 05:48:56AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > that such obvious attempts at avoiding license restrictions wouldn't get > > you all that far with a judge either. We're not willing to let people use > > "dynamic linking" as a way of avoiding the GPL's tentacles, in a pretty > > similar situation. > A third party, who isn't even using Latex (and so not under its > license), could create a symlink. If it's a symlink to a derived work of LaTeX, he is using LaTeX. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Description: PGP signature