Re: Towards a new LPPL draft
Glenn Maynard wrote:
> I'm not a DD. For those interested in my opinion anyway: What if I
> want to modify Latex to remove the filename mapping? If the
> DFSG-freeness is dependent on that mechanism, then I can't remove it
> (for the best or worst of technical reasons) and have it remain
> DFSG-free. Having freeness dependent on a feature being present is
What's wrong with the conditional statement (unproven assertion:)
"The LPPL-1.3 is DFSG-free, but only when applied to software which makes
the file-renaming requirement easy"
This is essentially what is said about the GFDL, "It's DFSG-free only if no
options are used in the document"
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org