Re: User's thoughts about LPPL
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:38:47AM +0100, David Carlisle wrote:
>>> But you have *no* way to assure this, short of trademarking the name
>> That is a very tired argument.
>> Of course it is true as written, but it ignores the fact that LPPL has
>> been remarkably successful in its stated aims.
> Why do you believe that moving these things to a separate document,
> asking people to do this in good faith, would be any less successful
> than trying to force them to in a license?
Experience. The question «how to modify book.sty?» is a FAQ, and
the problem happened before the lppl was introduced (and it was
one of the reasons it was adopted, I think).
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org