Re: User's thoughts about LPPL
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:38:47AM +0100, David Carlisle wrote:
> > But you have *no* way to assure this, short of trademarking the name
> > "latex".
> That is a very tired argument.
> Of course it is true as written, but it ignores the fact that LPPL has
> been remarkably successful in its stated aims.
Why do you believe that moving these things to a separate document,
asking people to do this in good faith, would be any less successful
than trying to force them to in a license?
If they know the license is unenforcable and/or avoidable, then they're
already acting in good faith.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com