Re: Motivations; proposed alternative license
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 03:48, David Carlisle wrote:
> Could someone who speaks for Debian please state clearly how the TeX
> licence meets DFSG in ways that LPPL does not. If we can't understand
> this I don't see how we can possibly re-write LPPL to be compatible with
> both the TeX licence and DFSG.
> I repeat the TeX licence. Note point (2)
I am having trouble finding any file on my system (with tetex-base and
tetex-extra installed) that is licensed in this way. What file did you
pull this license from?
You should note that tetex in Debian is split into free and non-free
parts; it's entirely possible that the file you quote is in our non-free
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com