Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses
"C.M. Connelly" <email@example.com> writes:
> In the meantime, should we drop the possibly problematic files
> from our packages, or can we continue distributing them on the
> basis that we have been distributing them without problems thus
> far, and that CTAN continues to include them in their ``free''
> section? (Files that are egregiously non-DFSG-free will, of
> course, be dropped.)
Now that you've posted, we can't claim ignorance. :) I'll clarify my
thoughts about each of the licenses in separate messages (with changed
subjects, to hopefully keep it clearer).