Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
Scripsit Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> So, we've got four choices:
> a) Ignore the issue, hope it goes away, be inconsistent
> b) Special case RMS/the FSF
> c) Allow it for *everyone*
> d) Drop the GNU manuals as non-free, and write our own essay
> about the importance of free documentation...
b2) Special-case Emacs and GCC - on grounds that it would be absurd
not to have these particular packages documentet - *not*
just because RMS happens to back them.
Henning Makholm "Need facts -- *first*. Then
the dialysis -- the *analysis*."