Re: Change in ispell's copyright -> nonfree?
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:54:18AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > But I think including the URL in the package description would satisfy
> > the license.
>
> Are we to permit licensors to dictate to us the precise contents of our
> package descriptions? Should this be regarded as compatible with the
> DFSG?
>
> --
> G. Branden Robinson
Those are different questions. I already said I didn't know whether
this condition made it non-free or not. But in my opinion, distribution
of that package (and sources) such as we do from http://packages.debian.org
does not qualify us for the exemption from that clause.
Peter
Reply to: