Re: LDP in main?
- To: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, David Merrill <david@lupercalia.net>, doc-linux-es@packages.debian.org, doc-linux-ja@packages.debian.org, doc-linux-zh@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: LDP in main?
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 23:03:32 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20011204040332.GC13290@deadbeast.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, David Merrill <david@lupercalia.net>, doc-linux-es@packages.debian.org, doc-linux-ja@packages.debian.org, doc-linux-zh@packages.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011203183250.A6197@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20011202213041.GE26803@riva.ucam.org> <[🔎] 20011202154841.A27984@debian.org> <[🔎] 20011202182758.B9494@lupercalia.net> <[🔎] 20011203183250.A6197@debian.org>
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:32:50PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> doc-linux: GFDL, GPL, OPL, PD
Keep in mind that the GFDL and OPL are only uncontroversially DFSG-free
if they don't contain unmodifiable text, aside from the text of license
document itself.
--
G. Branden Robinson | Somewhere, there is a .sig so funny
Debian GNU/Linux | that reading it will cause an
branden@debian.org | aneurysm. This is not that .sig.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpp7psgQ_yDx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: