Re: Group Copyright
John Galt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On 20 Jul 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >John Galt <email@example.com> writes:
> >> If the fiction that a corporation has rights as a person is granted, it
> >> only follows that the next step in the progression is that unincorporated
> >> groups start to get the same rights. It's as screwed up as a football
> >> bat, but that's never stopped the .gov before. However, the worst case is
> >> that this makes the copyright a pseudonymous work, subject to the
> >> copyright laws thereon, which still means that infringement isn't the
> >> smartest thing to do...:)
> >Can you *please* leave out the Randroid political commentary?
> When you leave out the stumping for the FSF.
Free software politics is appropriate on Debian lists (at least,
relevant Debian lists). Complaining about the details of American
corporation law is not. Random slams on government is not.