debian-legal Jun 2000 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Wichert Akkerman
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Mike Bilow
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Peter Makholm
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Mike Bilow
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Raul Miller
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Mike Bilow
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Raul Miller
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Mike Bilow
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Raul Miller
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Colin Watson
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Mike Bilow
practical question on copying of our HTML code
Mark Rafn
Re: practical question on copying of our HTML code
Mike Bilow
Re: practical question on copying of our HTML code
Raul Miller
Re: practical question on copying of our HTML code
nitebirdz
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Ronald L. Chichester
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Ronald L. Chichester
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Ronald L. Chichester
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
RE: complete clone of the debian website
Andrew Weiss
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Chloe Hoffman
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Chloe Hoffman
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: complete clone of the debian website
Chloe Hoffman
KDE libs
Daniel Glassey
Re: KDE libs
David Starner
Re: KDE libs
Raul Miller
Would this be applicable to the API issue?
Andrew Weiss
Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue?
Mike Bilow
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue?
Chloe Hoffman
Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue?
Mike Bilow
Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue?
Raul Miller
Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue?
Chloe Hoffman
Re: [Debian] Majordomo will be removed (fwd)
Julian Gilbey
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Debian] Majordomo will be removed (fwd)
Julian Gilbey
Re: ITP: malsync
Anand Kumria
Re: CMU Sphinx licence thread from January..
ferret
Re: CMU Sphinx licence thread from January..
Brian Ristuccia
Plan 9 is Open Sourced
Juhapekka Tolvanen
license of smapi
Martin Butterweck
Re: license of smapi
Henning Makholm
Re: license of smapi
Martin Butterweck
Re: license of smapi
Henning Makholm
Re: license of smapi
Mike Bilow
Re: license of smapi
Henning Makholm
Re: license of smapi
Mike Bilow
Re: license of smapi
Henning Makholm
xmysqladmin- make can not find xforms.h
Rafael Santander
Re: xmysqladmin- make can not find xforms.h
Henning Makholm
Re: complete clone of the debian website (Joke?)
Greg Fodor
outside USA
giulio
Re: outside USA
Henning Makholm
Re: outside USA
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: outside USA
Chloe Hoffman
new version of pilrc with strange license addition
Ashley Clark
Re: new version of pilrc with strange license addition
David Starner
Re: new version of pilrc with strange license addition
Ashley Clark
Re: new version of pilrc with strange license addition
John Goerzen
Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action
Konrad Rosenbaum
Re: Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action
J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
Re: Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action
Raul Miller
Re: Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action
Joseph Carter
Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
KDE vs. Debian GPL-statements (Fwd: Re: proposal of a paragraph of GPL v.3)
Konrad Rosenbaum
Re: KDE vs. Debian GPL-statements (Fwd: Re: proposal of a paragraph of GPL v.3)
Joseph Carter
Re: KDE vs. Debian GPL-statements
Richard Braakman
reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Andrew Lenharth
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
James Troup
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Andrew Lenharth
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Wichert Akkerman
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Andrew Lenharth
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
David Starner
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Brian Behlendorf
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd)
Andrew Lenharth
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific)
Andrew Lenharth
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific)
Wichert Akkerman
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific)
Martin Douda
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific)
Henrik Nordstrom
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific)
Henrik Nordstrom
[bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Brian Almeida
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Brian Ristuccia
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Nick Moffitt
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Brian Ristuccia
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Brian Ristuccia
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Josip Rodin
Re: whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Adrian Bunk
Re: whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Josip Rodin
Re: whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
David Starner
[Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Joseph Carter
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Chip Salzenberg
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Chip Salzenberg
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Brian Behlendorf
Message not available
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Joseph Carter
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Brian Behlendorf
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
David Starner
New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Mark Wielaard
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
David Starner
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Mark Wielaard
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Brian Behlendorf
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Mark Wielaard
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Brian Behlendorf
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Raul Miller
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Mark Wielaard
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
sam th
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Richard Stallman
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Joseph Carter
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Mark Wielaard
Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?]
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
[OT] What does 'General Public License' mean?
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean?
Henning Makholm
Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean?
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean?
Raul Miller
Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean?
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL?
Richard Stallman
Re: Don't know if it can help...
Colin Watson
Re: Don't know if it can help...
Raul Miller
Re: Don't know if it can help...
Nick Moffitt
Non-free license in included source
Bolan Meek
Re: Non-free license in included source
Anthony Towns
Re: Non-free license in included source
Bolan Meek
Re: Non-free license in included source
Henning Makholm
Re: hp2pbm_2.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Camm Maguire
Re: hp2pbm_2.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Henning Makholm
SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license
James A. Treacy
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license
Henning Makholm
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license
sam th
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license
Henning Makholm
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license
Marcelo E. Magallon
The last update was on 20:16 GMT Fri Mar 07. There are 145 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc