Re: Free Documentation License
Jules Bean wrote:
> Since it doesn't apply to software, that's a non-issue.
I'm very tempted to go package up, say, the quake1 level files and try to
upload them to main. After all, they're not software, so who gives a hoot
if they violate the DFSG?
> It does, once again, re-raise the issue of whether we need to a)
> extend the DFSG to cover documentation, or b) establish some kind of
> debian guidelines for acceptable document licenses.
> Note that we do include a variety of textual works (documents) whose
> license doesn't comply with the DFSG.
Yes, and I hate it. It's damned hypocritical
see shy jo