debian-legal Mar 2000 by date

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mar 01

What type of license for iozone bug1
Unidentified subject! debian-legal-request
Unidentified subject! debian-legal-request
Re: What type of license for iozone Henning Makholm
Re: What type of license for iozone Don Marti
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others Thomas Bushnell, BSG
영어,일어 생활회화 무료 mailing service 안내!! 이현우
[Fwd: license for iozone] bug1

Mar 02

Re: [Fwd: license for iozone] Henning Makholm

Mar 03

real ksh available as sources Juhapekka Tolvanen
Re: real ksh available as sources Henning Makholm
Re: real ksh available as sources Elie Rosenblum
AT&T source licence? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: AT&T source licence? Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source licence? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: real ksh available as sources Craig Sanders

Mar 04

Re: AT&T source licence? Joey Hess
Is this good enough for non-free? Tommi Virtanen
Re: AT&T source licence? David Starner

Mar 07

RE: Is this good enough for non-free? Sean 'Shaleh' Perry

Mar 08

Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Shaul Karl
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Raul Miller

Mar 10

license for iozone bug1
Re: license for iozone Jeff Teunissen
Re: license for iozone bug1
License of Meschach Chuan-kai Lin
Re: License of Meschach Henning Makholm

Mar 11

Examples for non-freeness (Was: Re: AT&T source licence?) Juergen A. Erhard
Re: Free Documentation License Joey Hess
Re: Free Documentation License Raul Miller
Re: Free Documentation License Jules Bean

Mar 12

Re: Free Documentation License Joey Hess
Re: Free Documentation License Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re: Free Documentation License Jules Bean

Mar 13

Re: Free Documentation License Fabien Ninoles
Re: Free Documentation License Fabien Ninoles
Re: Free Documentation License Raul Miller

Mar 14

[GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? SCOTT FENTON
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Branden Robinson
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Brian Ristuccia
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Brian Ristuccia
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Tomasz Wegrzanowski

Mar 15

Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Fabien Ninoles
vnterm3.3 Copyright Ashley Clark
Re: vnterm3.3 Copyright Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: 'impact' ttf license? Joseph Carter
Question Michael Meskes
Re: 'impact' ttf license? Stefan Ott
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? William T Wilson
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Question Ronald L . Chichester
Re: Question SCOTT FENTON
Re: Question Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Shaul Karl

Mar 16

Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
[no subject] Andrew McRobert
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Fabien Ninoles
GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works" Brian Kimball
GPL: collective works Brian Kimball

Mar 17

Re: GPL: collective works ferret
Re: GPL: collective works Brian Kimball

Mar 21

Re: ARM release status David N. Welton
Re: ARM release status Jeffry_Smith

Mar 22

Re: AT&T source code agreement Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source code agreement Branden Robinson
Re: AT&T source code agreement Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement David Starner
Re: AT&T source code agreement Elie Rosenblum
Re: AT&T source code agreement Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement Elie Rosenblum
Re: AT&T source code agreement Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement Elie Rosenblum
Re: AT&T source code agreement Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source code agreement Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source code agreement Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source code agreement Stephen C. North
RE: AT&T source code agreement Eric Sherrill

Mar 23

Re: AT&T source code agreement Ben Pfaff
RE: AT&T source code agreement Eric Sherrill
example of AT&T using free license. Mark Rafn
Re: AT&T source code agreement Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re: example of AT&T using free license. Ben Harris
Re: example of AT&T using free license. Branden Robinson
Re: AT&T source code agreement Steve Greenland

Mar 24

Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Christoph Baumann
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence David Starner
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Mark Rafn
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Christoph Baumann
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence David Starner
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Christoph Baumann

Mar 26

Maelstrom Copyright Christoph Baumann

Mar 27

[andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Christoph Baumann
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Richard Braakman

Mar 28

Re: AT&T source code agreement Remco Blaakmeer
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Branden Robinson
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Joseph Carter
RE: AT&T source code agreement Eric Sherrill
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Brian Ristuccia
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Joseph Carter
Re: GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works" Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: AT&T source code agreement Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: AT&T source code agreement Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Mar 29

Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Branden Robinson
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Christoph Baumann
Re: GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works" Brian Kimball
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Christoph Baumann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Brian Kimball
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Branden Robinson

The last update was on 20:16 GMT Fri Mar 07. There are 126 messages. Page 1 of 1.