Re: What is intern R & D? (was: Apple Public Source License)
Jens Ritter writes:
> But what strikes me more is that it allows copying, distribution, etc,
> "solely for Your internal research and development," (2.1).
> And they fail to define it. What do You think?
They have merely chosen a particulary verbose and awkward way to say that
you don't have comply with the source distribution and notification clauses
if you only use your modifications internally. Read 2.2.
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
firstname.lastname@example.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.