Is the OPL DFSG-ok?

["Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr>]

Hi,

 subject says it all, is the OpenContent License DFGS-ok?... now that
 I think about it, shouldn't that be OCL?  The _text_ of the OPL says
 "OpenContent License", not "OpenContent Public License".

 If the answer is yes, 

    a) can it be added to the DFSG as a DFSG-ok license?  How does one
       achieve this? (in other words, who shall be bugged?)

    b) shouldn't it be shipped in /usr/doc/copyright?


                               Marcelo