debian-legal Jan 1999 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Postfix-0.0.19981230
lamont
Re: Postfix-0.0.19981230
john
Concerns over Modula-3 copyrights.
Stuart Lamble
Re: Concerns over Modula-3 copyrights.
J.H.M. Dassen
Re: Concerns over Modula-3 copyrights.
Joey Hess
Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
john
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Anthony Towns
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
john
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
john
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
John Hasler
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
John Hasler
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
John Hasler
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
john
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Henning Makholm
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
john
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
James Troup
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
john
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
James Troup
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
john
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
James Troup
Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Wichert Akkerman
cfortran and free software
chrislee
Re: cfortran and free software
john
Re: The Sun Community Source License is Very Bad News
john
Re: The Sun Community Source License is Very Bad News
Richard Stallman
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: The Sun Community Source License is Very Bad News
Ean R . Schuessler
[mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
Anthony Towns
Re: [mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
Anthony Towns
Re: [mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
john
Re: [mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
Henning Makholm
Re: [mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
john
Re: [mool@oce.nl: Re: Debian license (was: GTK)]
Raul Miller
Re: Good news: Free Haskell to come out RSN!
David Starner
Re: Good news: Free Haskell to come out RSN!
john
Re: Good news: Free Haskell to come out RSN!
Kristoffer . Rose
Re: Good news: Free Haskell to come out RSN!
Anthony Towns
Re: Good news: Free Haskell to come out RSN!
john
Re: Good news: Free Haskell to come out RSN!
john
Re: Good news: Free Haskell to come out RSN!
Kristoffer . Rose
Qt license okay?
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Qt license okay?
john
Re: Qt license okay?
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Qt license okay?
Anthony Towns
Re: Qt license okay?
Joseph Carter
Re: Qt license okay?
Anthony Towns
Re: Qt license okay?
Joseph Carter
Re: Qt license okay?
Joseph Carter
Re: Qt license okay?
Gregor Hoffleit
Re: Qt license okay?
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Qt license okay?
Raul Miller
Re: Qt license okay?
John Hasler
Re: Qt license okay?
Gregor Hoffleit
Re: Qt license okay?
John Hasler
Re: Qt license okay?
Gregor Hoffleit
Re: Qt license okay?
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Qt license okay?
John Hasler
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Qt license okay?
Peter S Galbraith
French license (for sympa)
Raphael Hertzog
Re: French license (for sympa)
James Troup
Re: French license (for sympa)
Raphael Hertzog
Re: New DFSG Draft revision #3
John Hasler
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: New DFSG Draft revision #3
John Hasler
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Jules Bean
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Ben Collins
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Jules Bean
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Henning Makholm
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Philipp Frauenfelder
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Craig Sanders
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Henning Makholm
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Philipp Frauenfelder
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Intent to package: vcg
John Hasler
Re: Intent to package: vcg
Wichert Akkerman
Logo license update?
servis
Re: Logo license update?
Brandon Mitchell
Re: Logo license update?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Logo license update?
James A. Treacy
RE: Logo license update?
Darren Benham
Re: non-root password lookups?
J. S. Connell
[OOPS!] Re: non-root password lookups?
J. S. Connell
Zope license
Jules Bean
Re: Zope license
Gregor Hoffleit
Re: Zope license
Jules Bean
Re: Zope license
Bruce Perens
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Zope license
Bruce Perens
Re: Zope license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Zope license
Henning Makholm
Re: Zope license
Bruce Perens
Re: Zope license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Zope license
Raul Miller
Re: Zope license
Bruce Perens
Re: Zope license
Raul Miller
Re: Zope license
Raul Miller
Re: Zope license
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Zope license
Joey Hess
Re: Zope license
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Zope license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Zope license
Raul Miller
Re: Zope license
Joey Hess
Re: Zope license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Zope license
Bruce Perens
Re: Zope license
Jules Bean
Re: Zope license
Raul Miller
Re: Zope license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Zope license
Raul Miller
Re: Zope license
Bruce Perens
Re: Zope license
Anthony Fok
Re: Zope license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Zope license
John Hasler
We distribute LyX?
David Starner
Message not available
Re: We distribute LyX?
David Starner
Re: We distribute LyX?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: We distribute LyX?
Jules Bean
Re: We distribute LyX?
Navindra Umanee
Re: We distribute LyX?
Joseph Carter
Re: We distribute LyX?
Navindra Umanee
Re: We distribute LyX?
David Starner
Re: We distribute LyX?
Raul Miller
Re: We distribute LyX?
David Starner
Re: We distribute LyX?
John Hasler
Re: We distribute LyX?
Raul Miller
Re: We distribute LyX?
David Starner
Re: We distribute LyX?
Peter S Galbraith
Re: We distribute LyX?
Navindra Umanee
Re: We distribute LyX?
Jules Bean
Re: We distribute LyX?
Navindra Umanee
Re: We distribute LyX?
Raul Miller
Re: We distribute LyX?
Scott K. Ellis
Re: We distribute LyX?
John Hasler
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: We distribute LyX?
joostje
GPLed gettext.
Santiago Vila
Re: GPLed gettext.
Jules Bean
Re: GPLed gettext.
Santiago Vila
Re: GPLed gettext.
Jules Bean
Re: GPLed gettext.
Henning Makholm
Re: GPLed gettext.
Santiago Vila
Re: GPLed gettext.
Vincent Renardias
Re: GPLed gettext.
Santiago Vila
License for DOCs in main?
Peter S Galbraith
Re: License for DOCs in main?
Jules Bean
Re: License for DOCs in main?
Henning Makholm
Re: License for DOCs in main?
Jules Bean
Re: License for DOCs in main?
Raul Miller
Re: License for DOCs in main?
Darren Benham
Licenses for non-software works, and the definition of software, and , the new DFSG
Jules Bean
Artistic license
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Artistic license
John Hasler
RE: Artistic license
Darren Benham
license query
Hamish Moffatt
Re: license query
John Hasler
Re: license query
Hamish Moffatt
Re: license query
John Hasler
Re: license query
Hamish Moffatt
Mgetty should be in non-free?
Edward John M. Brocklesby
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Jules Bean
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Ben Pfaff
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
John Hasler
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Jules Bean
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
John Hasler
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
John Hasler
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
John Hasler
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
John Hasler
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
John Hasler
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Edward John M. Brocklesby
Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?
Jules Bean
Re: Intent to package: olex
Lalo Martins
Re: Intent to package: olex
Shaleh
Re: tex4ht - Debian package (fwd)
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: tex4ht - Debian package (fwd)
Jules Bean
lprng license
David Frey
Re: lprng license
David Starner
Re: lprng license
Richard Braakman
Re: lprng license
Ben Pfaff
Re: lprng license
Henning Makholm
Re: lprng license
John Hasler
Re: lprng license
Jules Bean
Re: lprng license
John Hasler
Re: lprng license
Jules Bean
Re: lprng license
Richard Braakman
Re: lprng license
John Hasler
Re: lprng license
Jules Bean
¿Misuse of Debian name and logo?
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
Re: ¿Misuse of Debian name and logo?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: ¿Misuse of Debian name and logo?
Darren Benham
Re: ¿Misuse of Debian name and logo?
Ben Collins
Re: ¿Misuse of Debian name and logo?
Darren Benham
Re: ¿Misuse of Debian name and logo?
Darren Benham
Re: ¿Misuse of Debian name and logo?
Raul Miller
New LyX Clarification
David Starner
Re: New LyX Clarification
Jules Bean
Re: New LyX Clarification
John Hasler
Proposed Grail and JPython Licenses
Guido van Rossum
Re: Proposed Grail and JPython Licenses
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Proposed Grail and JPython Licenses
Henning Makholm
Re: Proposed Grail and JPython Licenses
John Hasler
Re: Proposed Grail and JPython Licenses
John Hasler
Re: Proposed Grail and JPython Licenses
James LewisMoss
"Public Domain"
Darren Benham
Re: "Public Domain"
Steve Greenland
Re: "Public Domain"
John Hasler
Re: "Public Domain"
John Hasler
The last update was on 19:58 GMT Fri Mar 07. There are 221 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc