Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 06:29:46 -0000
Message-id: <[🔎] slrnbc146q.3gu.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <vxHLQB.A.GoF.JXyv-@murphy> <[🔎] 20030512182206.B1DF629F9C@mixing.qc.dfo.ca> <[🔎] 20030512182206.B1DF629F9C@mixing.qc.dfo.ca> <[🔎] 87of28gc7r.fsf@marant.org>

=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant <jmarant@nerim.net> wrote:
> As long as I am a GNU Emacs user, I object to see the Emacs manual
> going to non-free. Currently, it is provided by the emacs package

You are complaining to the wrong people, I think.  Fix the licence,
not the social contract.

MJR

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr>

References:
- Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <psg@debian.org>
- Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
  - From: jmarant@nerim.net (Jérôme Marant)

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Droit d'auteur vs. free software?
Next by Date: DFSG analysis of default LDP license
Previous by thread: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Next by thread: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread