Re: RFC: Create d-user-woody, d-user-sarge maillists, deactivate d-user
Le 12387ième jour après Epoch,
hereon1@fastmail.us écrivait:
> Since many questions in the debian-laptop list are user oriented
> questions,
> I thought it would be helpful to the Debian community to ensure the
> readers here are aware of the following message I just sent to the
> debian-user list.
>
> RFC: Create d-user-woody, d-user-sarge maillists, deactivate d-user
I think that create a d-u-stable and d-u-testing is a good idea for
distrib level specific questions, but deactivating d-u is a bad
idea. How can people be aware that a question is level specific? I
think that d-u is good for general questions.
About d-u-unstable, I'm not sure a ML is a good idea. Why not using
devel, so close to unstable? And inform non-devel user of the unstable
distrib that it is a bad idea to use unstable if they are not aware of
the BTS and other tools ?
My 2¢.
--
The more control, the more that requires control.
Reply to: