Quoting Ben Hutchings (firstname.lastname@example.org): > > OK. Point taken. Reverting to "id". > > I was explaining my reasoning, but I accept that ID is more common and > may be more understandable. So, no need to revert. Point re-taken. So re-reverting back to ID..:) > One more try: > > "You should generally identify these devices by UUID or label. However, > on MIPS systems the root device must be identified by name." I like this one. It makes things very clear, even for non native speakers.
Description: Digital signature