I'm adopting stunnel, and updating it to version 4. Since this is a
big change, I want to add a News.Debian entry, and would like to make
sure it's clear. Would someone please proofread the following?
Thanks in advance, and please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
stunnel (2:4.20-1) experimental; urgency=low
* Stunnel 3 is deprecated. The new stunnel4 has a different command line
syntax and configuration. You will need to update your scripts.
There is a wrapper script that understands stunnel3 command line
syntax and calls stunnel4 with the right configuration. As far as I could
determine, it supports every stunnel3 option *except* for
-S sources which certificate source defaults to use
0 = ignore all defaults sources
1 = use ssl library defaults
2 = use stunnel defaults
3 = use both ssl library and stunnel defaults
This script is installed as /usr/bin/stunnel3
In order to create less migration problems, /usr/bin/stunnel is a
symlink to the wrapper script. A future version will make the link
point to stunnel4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature