Re: Building vanilla kernel .debs
* maximilian attems <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
>> The equivalent to --revision is KDEB_PKGVERSION, but I haven't yet
>> found a way to emulate --append, since this probably needs
>> modification to the upstream version number ending up in
>> include/linux/utsrelease.h. Is there a variable for this as well, or
>> is the official way to do so parsing EXTRAVERSION from the top-level
>> Makefile and make all EXTRAVERSION=$EXTRAVERSION-foo?
> indeed KDEB_PKGVERSION sets the debian revision.
> well EXTRAVERSION is not recommend to play around.
Though if you don't want to have the '-rc6' inside the *package*
name you don't have any other option than unsetting/overriding
> a better way to append a string to upstream version
> (in my game "-foo" was "-grml") is to set CONFIG_LOCALVERSION:
> ~/src/linux-2.6$ egrep LOCALVERSION .config
> # CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not set
> current tree called with
> KDEB_PKGVERSION="grml.00~2.6.32-rc6.20091104" fakeroot make deb-pkg j=2
> results in:
> dpkg-deb: building package `linux-image-2.6.32-rc6-grml' in `../linux-image-2.6.32-rc6-grml_grml.00~2.6.32-rc6.20091104_amd64.deb'.
LOCALVERSION is fine if you want to *extend* the default package
> hope that helps, now soon this should end in a more readable doc..
I really like the option to use make deb-pkg for generating debian
packages, should be promoted - yes. :)
What I'd like to see:
* possibility to build linux-headers and linux-source package
* possibility to provide/maintain a non-default-template
debian/changelog (a cmdline option to specify a file that should
be used [as base] might be a good start?)
thanks && regards,