[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#545920: marked as done ('W: Possible missing firmware ... for module e100' even though e100 isn't loaded)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:20:05 +0200
with message-id <20090910092005.GN21292@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#545920: 'W: Possible missing firmware ... for module e100' even though e100 isn't loaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #545920,
regarding 'W: Possible missing firmware ... for module e100' even though e100 isn't loaded
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
545920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545920
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
Severity: normal


# update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-grml64
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/e100/d102e_ucode.bin for module e100
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/e100/d101s_ucode.bin for module e100
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/e100/d101m_ucode.bin for module e100
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.26-2-amd64
update-initramfs -u -k all  8.01s user 3.54s system 106% cpu 10.804 total
# lsmod | grep e100
e1000e                138944  0
#

My guess is that the check inside initramfs-tools isn't precise
enough when matching the module name ('e100' being part of
'e1000e').

regards,
-mika-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.93.1

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:44:12AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.92o
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> # update-initramfs -u -k all
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-grml64
> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/e100/d102e_ucode.bin for module e100
> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/e100/d101s_ucode.bin for module e100
> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/e100/d101m_ucode.bin for module e100
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.26-2-amd64
> update-initramfs -u -k all  8.01s user 3.54s system 106% cpu 10.804 total
> # lsmod | grep e100
> e1000e                138944  0
> #
> 
> My guess is that the check inside initramfs-tools isn't precise
> enough when matching the module name ('e100' being part of
> 'e1000e').

fixed in newer initramfs-tools, to busy to look up the relevant version,
but it is fixed in testing/unstable where missing firmware matters much
more.

thanks for report.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: